*Jega: It is not true
*Lessons before Osun election
What was the leadership of the Independent National Electoral
Commission, INEC, thinking about when it set out to appoint monitors for
last month’s governorship election in Ekiti State?
This question becomes very pertinent against the backdrop of the avowed
determination of Professor Attahiru Jega, INEC’s Chairman, to
consistently deliver free and fair elections to Nigeria.
And whereas political pundits have attempted to analyse why and how
Dr. Kayode Fayemi, the state governor, lost, INEC almost introduced
muddle into the entire exercise. But for the seeming determination of
majority of the voting public in the state – at least based on the
result of the election as declared – any other result may have thrown
the whole exercise into a kilter.
Apart from the obvious presence of Nigeria’s military on the day of
election, almost making the election appear like a war-time event, the
general consensus is that the election went well.
However, the decision of INEC to send 10 Resident Electoral
Commissioners, RECs, from some states other than the ones contiguous to
Ekiti is raising some concerns even within the Commission.
Sunday Vanguard was told by INEC insiders that the usual practice in
elections past was to appoint RECs from states that are contiguous to
the state where the electoral event would hold.
But in the case of Ekiti State governorship election, not only were
RECs from far flung states appointed to participate in the election,
Sunday Vanguard discovered that there were no RECs from the South East
or the South South geo-political zones.
This development, Sunday Vanguard has been made to understand, is
causing ripples within INEC. To support the latter claim, sources in
INEC pointed out that the Ekiti mission was fraught with many internal
dissensions and inconsistencies. They refer to instances of animosities
between some national Commissioners particularly two close commissioners
with almost the same temperament and attitude who resented the
overbearing attitude of one national Commissioner who has elevated
himself with the apparent blessing of the Chairman, to the status of a
“Super-National Commissioner”.
To buttress this claim, audit of all those selected for the election showed that all electoral officers and
10 Resident Commissioners that were posted to the Ekiti elections were
all exclusively from north and South West. To disguise this obvious
act, two national commissioners inside source in INEC described as
unserious and one of whom had never made independent and useful
contribution at any meeting since appointed were asked to be part of the
exercise for mere semblance of representation.
When asked why this should be done given that the Electoral Commissioners were supposed to be impartial and professional
irrespective of their states or zones of origin, the source claimed that
irrespective of how professional the posted Electoral Commissioners
were, it was the norm to ensure regional balancing in such postings to
mitigate suspicion and build trust on the part of stakeholders.
It was further observed that there was no memo informing selected
participants, prior to the election posting, and insist that it is a
matter of fact that there was no formal consultations between the
national commissioners to compile a list based on set criteria that
would depoliticize and depersonalize such a list.
According to inside sources in INEC, the previous practice under
successive leadership of the Commission even as recent as under
Professor Maurice Iwu, with respect to such isolated elections like the
Ekiti election, was that a meeting of the Commission will be convened to
do a scenario analysis of the election location, in order to determine
the choice of personnel deployment; such deployment list will be
reviewed in a formal meeting and observations will be made to point out
inconsistencies and issues that may have political salience but which
may have been ignored.
Moreover, there are concerns whether Prof Jega can withstand the
pressure from some vested interests from the northern political
establishment to claim political power by hook or crook. There were also
unconfirmed reports that some of those posted to oversee the elections
may not have been remunerated equally, thereby fueling further suspicion
that all may not be well.
But Kayode Idowu, Chief Press Secretary to Professor Jega, dismissed the insinuations.
In a chat with Sunday Vanguard, Idowu said it is sometimes ridiculous
“why Nigerians like to read needless meanings into things INEC does. The
Commission selects officials for assignment based on their capabilities
and their availability. The Commission is very dispassionate about its
activities and it is not interested in where people come from or do not
come from”.
No matter. That an election is being held in a South West state and
all the RECs appointed for the exercise are from the North and the same
South West sends the wrong signal. This is accentuated by the fact that
the political thinking of the then Action Congress of Nigeria, ACN, in
merging with the All Peoples Party, APP, and the Congress for
Progressive Change, CPC, is that a political forced forged in the
furnace of South West and the North would be unbeatable.
Had the incumbent won the Ekiti election, INEC would have been at
pains to explain away why the appointments of RECs totally shunned those
of the South South and South East. Observers insist that on the part of
INEC the outcome was serendipity – a success that occurred because fate
smiled on the Commission rather than from its own exertions.
To be fair, Jega continues to maintain his dignity. One of the very
positive outcomes of the Ekiti election was his resolute stance that the
Permanent Voter Card, PVC, would be used. He withstood pressure from
many quarters to reverse the decision to go ahead.
This has set a tone for future elections. The Osun governorship
election which holds next week would present another test for Jega’s
INEC. It is hoped that he would again succeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment