Saturday, 21 December 2013

Why APC Will Not Practice Political Puritanism...

One of my friends on face book, John Okwori this morning in response to one of my shared story on the Punch Newspaper (8th December, 2013) on the efforts been made by the leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party to stopped the planned massive defection of its membership in the House of Representatives to the All; Progressives Congress in the wake of the defection of Five Governors to the PDP to the APC asked me a pointed, intriguing and knotty question. John Okwori asked thus:“ Chief, I suppose APC are credible opposition to be credible opposition to APC why are they accepting members of PDP believed to be corrupt”.
My answer to the question of Okwori was thus: “Why wouldn’t APC accept PDP members who voluntarily decide to leave their Party and join the APC in exercise of their constitutional right of Freedom of Association. It is not possible to decree that some class of people would not be accepted in a Political Party.
This will also constitutes an infraction of the constitutional provision that prohibits discrimination against anybody on ground of class, race, ethnicity, political thought and gender. In law there is nothing like guilty by association. There is also no vicarious responsibility in criminal law.
It is therefore not correct to brand everybody in PDP corrupt because some others are perceived to be corrupt. It is just not possible to practice political Puritanism in a pluralistic political environment such as Nigeria, so the APC is right to accept all sort or motley of crowd that clamours for its membership to enable it push out the PDP. After that the wheat shall be separated from the chaff. It will amount to political naivety to close the APC from those are running away from the PDP just to play to the gallery that APC is progressive and anti corruption”.
Obviously Okwori spoke the minds of many Nigerians why have been questioning the progressive credentials of the APC for accepting disillusioned and disenchanted members of the PDP into its fold. As I pointed out previously it is just not possible to practice political Puritanism at this point in time in the constitutional and political evolution of the country.
It is clear that the PDP is one of the multifarious problems confronting and grappling the country. So the reality on ground now is for all nationalist and progressives forces and groups that are appalled with the failings of the PDP to coalesce to push out the PDP in order to create a conductive environment to carry out a comprehensive and fundamental political, social and economic restricting of the country.
I will draw an inspiration on the thesis I am labouring to propound from the experience of the Republic of Georgia where fractionalization of the ruling party; fragmentation of the political elite and the massive defection of members to other political parties was one of the factors that precipitated the Rose Revolution took place in November, 2003 that led to the political and economic reform that has changed the fortunes of that country for good.
Georgia is a country found in the Caucasus region of Eurasia. It is in the crossroads of Eastern Europe and Western Asia. . It was until 1991, known as the Georgian Socialist Republic and part of the defunct Soviet Union following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in 1917. After independence in 1991, Georgia suffered from intractable civil unrest and economic crisis for most of the 1990s that culminated in the Rose Revolution.
The Rose Revolution erupted in November, 2003 after the opposition accused the government of President Eduard Shevardnadze of rigging the parliamentary election. The uproar generated by the ballot rigging allegation led to massive street protests that led to the collapsed of government. The ranks of the ruling Citizens’ Union of Georgia (CUG)was decimated and depleted by massive defection to the opposition political parties. The CUG has been ruling party for most of President Eduard Shevardnadze ‘s presidency and represented the interest of Shevardnadze’s loyalists. The ineffectiveness and incompetence of government and plummeting popularity led to massive defection of parliamentary deputies in 2000 and numerous party officials from the CUG Party.
The first group to leave was the business caucus and it would go on to form to the New Rights Party(NRP) in 2000.This began the collapse of the ruling CUG and led to formation of several other splinter political parties. President Eduard Shevardnadze himself abandoned the Party and resigned as the Chairman in September, 2001.
The Minister of Justice, Mikheil Saakashvili left the CUG in September, 2001 and formed the National Opposition Movement Party in October, 2001. The defection from the ruling party continued unabated and left the Citizens’ Union of Georgia greatly weakened and its support base eroded and clustered in a few regions of the Country and a leadership notorious for the accumulation of illegal wealth taking advantage of it position in government and dispersed the political elite amongst a number of new parties and independent platforms.
These opposition political parties did not reject these decampees from the Citizens’ Union of Georgia simply because the Party was corrupt and believed to be responsible for the political and economic woes of Georgia.
I hold the view that it is wrong for people to judge the APC bases on the people that are joining it from the PDP. The APC should be judge from a dispassionate and objective examination and analysis of its manifesto to determine whether or not it a progressive political party out to chart a new cause for the country.
Okoi Obono-Obla
9th December, 2013

No comments: